RADIO
Strength of schedule analysis is a common thing you'll see in fantasy football analysis. With just 16 (17 now, I guess) games on the schedule every year, the list of teams on your schedule can make a big difference in your final year metrics. If you get to face the league's worst offense twice while other teams don't face them at all, that makes a big difference.
Things are different in baseball. Strength of schedule metrics tend to even out over that big of a data sample. Most people realize this inherently without it needing to be proven, so we don't often bother analyzing the schedules. Well, I bothered to do it.
The lack of a salary cap in Major League Baseball has really led to huge differences in the firepower on the league's teams. It feels ridiculous that the Pittsburgh Pirates and the Los Angeles Dodgers are in the same league and have to play each other. It's also true that the schedules aren't balanced out, teams play almost half of their games against teams in their division, which does end up giving some teams much easier goes of it throughout the long season. Let's get into this.
Featured Promo: For this week only, take 50% off any full-season or yearly Premium Pass on the site! Just enter discount code THANKS when checking out. Thanks for being a reader, and Happy Holidays! Sign Up Now!
Pitchers
It is important for me to detail how I went about this, because it is probably not what you'd expect. With the massive MLB Savant pitch-by-pitch dataset and Python programming, I was able to quickly get each pitcher's schedule data based on the list of hitters they actually faced, rather than just looking at stats from the teams they faced. If a pitcher makes 25 starts, with two being against the Blue Jays, but they were lucky enough that George Springer wasn't in the Blue Jays lineup both times - that would make a difference, and just looking at end-of-year team offensive stats wouldn't account for it.
So for each pitcher that threw 1500 or more pitches (the equivalent of about 16 starts), I did the following:
- Listed all of the hitters they faced, leaving in the duplicates
- Got rid of the hitters that had fewer than 25 plate appearances so we could average the stats out without getting adverse effects from the really sample sizes (we don't want some guy went 0/3 this year to bring down the average SLG rate with the .000, for example).
- Merged in each hitter's end of year stats (SLG, K%, BB%, and Brl%)
- Averaged out the statistics for each pitcher
I hope that makes sense, here are the results all in one table.
The first thing I noticed here was that when you sort by slugging percentage (ascending), you don't find a player on an American League team until James Kaprielian is way down at #18, and only six of the top 30 spots were taken by AL pitchers. Not getting to face a pitcher two or three times a game makes a big difference over the course of the year, so it's always a great idea to upgrade any pitcher going from an American League team to a National League team, or at least that will be true as long as the DH doesn't become universal.
In terms of easiest schedules for fantasy-relevant pitchers, Luis Castillo, Zack Wheeler, Pablo Lopez, Kevin Gausman, Kyle Hendricks, Chris Bassitt, Tyler Mahle, and Lance McCullers Jr. stand out as they all are in the top 30 in lowest slugging percentages faced. Flipping slugging percentage around, we see that it was a tough year to be in the American League East division. Ten of the 15 toughest schedules were pitchers on the Orioles, Rays, Yankees, or Red Sox. Yusei Kikuchi pitched in the lighter hitting American League West division, but faced the Astros SIX times, and they were a brutal matchup all year long even while they were missing some key guys. I would be looking for a buy-low on Kikuchi next year.
Sorting by barrel rate we see more of the same, as that stat is strongly correlated with slugging percentage. Pitching for the Orioles was tough, as Jorge Lopez and Keegan Akin are both in the top five there. Shane McClanahan was put through the gauntlet in his rookie year, facing a 9.2% barrel rate and a .430 slugging percentage. Things aren't getting any easier next year for the guy, but maybe he will run into a few more starts outside of the division (nine of his 25 starts were against Boston, New York, or Toronto).
For the lowest barrel rates faced, we see a lot of National League West teams, with six of the top seven pitchers being on the Giants or Padres. That's pretty surprising since they had to face the Dodgers a bunch, but it is important to note that the Dodgers saw a ton of missed games from Mookie Betts, Max Muncy, and Cody Bellinger. The Giants caught the Dodgers on those soft patches quite a bit and guys like Kevin Gausman benefited from it (also facing the Rockies and Diamondbacks a bunch certainly helped).
The easiest strikeout schedules were more spread out between divisions, but you can still see lots of the leaders ending up in the National League Central and East divisions there. The toughest schedules for strikeouts were the American League West, which has everything to do with the Astros who just did not strike out this year.
You can go ahead and search a team abbreviation in that table and see the numbers for whomever you want.
full data in Excel form can be found here
I averaged this out further down two the division level, here are the results for each division and for each category we're talking about.
It was best to pitch in the NL Central or NL West, and really, really tough to be in the AL East. The other three divisions were pretty close together in the metrics, making for a neutral environment. Chances are this setup will stick around for next year, with slight changes as free agents sign and trades happen. Keep this table in mind when drafting pitchers for next year (although it's also important to recognize that this kind of stuff is typically baked into the ADP cake already).
Hitters
I did the same exact analysis again but this time flipping pitchers for hitters. For each hitter with at least 400 PA's in 2021, I looked at the full list of pitchers they faced and averaged out all of the end-of-year statistics from those pitchers. Then I averaged out each category for each hitter to come up with this table:
full data in Excel form can be found here
There are obviously a ton of hitters in the table above, but you can tell right away that the National League West was a tough place to hit in 2021. All but two of the hitters on the first page when you sort by slugging percentage were on the Diamondbacks, Padres, or Rockies. That will happen when you have to face the Dodgers and Giants a bunch, two of the best pitching staffs in the league. Sorting the other way, you see a lot of NL Central, AL Central, and AL East.
Jose Abreu had the easiest schedule of any hitter in terms of the average slugging percentage allowed by the full list of pitchers he faced. The 8.37% barrel rate there tied him with Whit Merrifield for first as well. It was a good year to be a hitter for the White Sox.
I broke it down by division here:
The AL East, AL Central, and NL Central all were pretty similar in terms of average slugging percentage faced, with the AL West and NL East a step-down but close, and then the NL West really stands out there at the bottom of the list. The strikeout rates were all very similar, and there's not much deviation in CSW rates either. The easiest places to hit for home runs were the AL East and the AL Central.
Note that this isn't the most reliable data here because it is skewed. For example, the Yankees hitters disproportionally faced pitchers who had to face a bunch of the Blue Jays as well, which would have bloated their numbers. The AL East pitchers may very well be much better than their numbers suggest, but they just ran into the elite offenses of the Blue Jays, Red Sox, and Yankees so much that the numbers don't bear that out. Even still, just thinking about the names on the pitching staffs in the AL East does a lot for us here. There just aren't many guys you would consider aces on those teams.
Conclusion
All of this stuff is best used for tie-breaker situations if you're deciding between players while ranking or drafting. It's not a great idea to take this strength of schedule data super seriously, but it's good to keep in mind at the more granular level. For example, I think I'll be pretty interested in drafting a guy like Yusei Kikuchi at the end of drafts next year seeing just how unfortunate his schedule was. He will likely only have to face the Astros three or four times next year rather than the six, which could make a significant difference on his numbers since you're only pulling 30 starts from a guy like that.
I would also be significantly upgrading any pitcher that gets moved from the American League to the National League, because we saw just how much easier NL pitchers have it in terms of the batters they have to face throughout the year.
I hope this helps, thanks for reading and feel free to reach out to me on Twitter @JonPGH with questions or other data requests!
Download Our Free News & Alerts Mobile App
Like what you see? Download our updated fantasy baseball app for iPhone and Android with 24x7 player news, injury alerts, sleepers, prospects & more. All free!
More Fantasy Baseball Advice
